News Legal
Ontario employers now required to disclose how they electronically monitor workers

By Jordan Omstead

Many Ontario employers must now have a policy detailing how and why they electronically monitor their workers, but experts say the law behind that requirement doesn’t establish new privacy rights for employees or give them the ability to challenge the scrutiny they are under.

The provincial government passed legislation in April that required employers with 25 or more workers to have an electronic monitoring policy and gave them six months to come up with one. The requirement kicked in on Tuesday and employers have 30 days to give workers a written copy.

Brenda McPhail, director of the privacy, technology and surveillance program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said the legislation was a good start.

“What this law does is provide some initial transparency,” McPhail said in an interview.

What it doesn’t do, she said, is give workers the ability to challenge that monitoring.

Many workers in Ontario have limited privacy protections at a time when a record number of people are working from home and new technologies have allowed for “increasingly intrusive” surveillance, McPhail said.

Pandemic fuelled market for surveillance technology

Meanwhile, the COVID-19 pandemic has fuelled the market for workplace surveillance technologies, she said. Technologies such as keystroke monitoring and eye movement detectors are increasingly common, as companies look for ways to track the productivity of remote employees, she said.

“The potential invasiveness of an employer trying to watch you … starts to feel more invasive for people who are working at home,” McPhail said.

The province has said the new policy helps protect workers’ privacy by requiring employers be transparent about how workers are being tracked.

Some observers noted, however, that the new requirement does not establish any additional privacy rights for workers.

In comparison, Alberta, British Columbia and Quebec have privacy legislation that sets some limits on the collection of employee information by private-sector organizations.

A ‘wild west’ of privacy

Under Ontario labour law, lawyer Andrew Langille said “it’s like a wild west” when it comes to privacy protections.

“Frankly, there are none outside of some very technical civil remedies that are really reserved for well-compensated professionals or executives — those are the only people who could afford those sorts of fights,” said Langille, co-ordinating staff lawyer at the Don Valley Community Legal Services.

While the shift to working from home during the pandemic highlighted the issue, Langille notes electronic monitoring has long existed in workplaces such as factories and fast-food restaurants.

In most workplaces, and in service work especially, he said most workers know they are being monitored because employers will actively disclose it, sometimes as a way to prevent theft or increase productivity.

“I would say this is not at all revolutionary for those types of environments,” he said.

Patrizia Piccolo, a Toronto employment lawyer, said she is advising her employer clients to write their policies with an expansive definition of electronic monitoring in mind, given the open-ended definition in the legislation.

McNaughton said the legislation’s wording is “deliberately broad” to capture a wide range of electronic monitoring practices, including sensors that track how quickly a cashier scans items at the grocery store to tracking a worker’s delivery truck using GPS.

For more information, visit https://www.ontario.ca/document/your-guide-employment-standards-act-0/written-policy-electronic-monitoring-employees